Dedoose has been field-tested and journal-proven by leading academic institutions and market researchers worldwide. Thousands of prominent researchers across the US and abroad have benefited from early versions of Dedoose in their qualitative and mixed methods work and have laid an outstanding publication and report trail along the way.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., Collins, K. M. T., Filer, J. D., Wiedmaier, C. D., & Moore, C. W. (2007)
American Educational Research Journal, 44(1): 113-160
Morgan, David L. (2004)
S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice, pp. 263-285. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Niglas, Katrin (1999)
Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Lahti, Finland, September 22-25
Hruschka, D. J., Schwartz, D., St. John, D. C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R. A., & Carey, J. W. (2004)
Field Methods, 16(3): 307-331
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene (2004)
H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 549-593. In S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice, pp. 535-545.
Ragin, Charles C., Nagel, Joane, & White, Patricia (2004)
National Science Foundation Report
Romney, A. Kimball (1999)
Current Anthropology, 40 (Supplement), S103-S115.
Weisner, T. S., Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1982)
Human Organization, 41(3): 237-244
Bryman, Alan (2007)
Mitchell, Sandra K. (1979)
Psychological Bulletin, 86(2): 376-390